LucenOne
Request a demo

DEMONSTRATION

See LucenOne work on a case that looks like yours.

No generic feature tour. We start from a scenario tailored to your context and follow the case through to the elements that support a decision.

Scenario tailored to your contextEnd-to-end case flowDiscussion focused on your work
Demo dataFictional data or data prepared exclusively for demonstration purposes.
FLOW

A demonstration follows the real thread of an investigation rather than a succession of screens.

  1. 01
    Intake & qualificationReport, direct case opening and admissibility in your context.
  2. 02
    Investigation & evidenceDocuments, images, audio, video and points requiring further work.
  3. 03
    Understanding the caseTimeline, contradictions, corroboration and investigation hot spots.
  4. 04
    Interviews & decisionPreparation, use of answers, human validation and deliverables.

THE PRODUCT IN ACTION

Sources remain visible. LucenOne surfaces what deserves attention.

Images, documents, audio and interviews remain accessible in context. Proposed results can be reviewed, corrected, confirmed or dismissed by the user.

01ImageDEMO · FICTIONAL DATA

The scene becomes usable evidence.

LucenOne locates useful visual elements directly on the image, then separates what is visible, what it contributes to the case and what the image cannot establish.

VISUAL ANALYSIS3 visual markers to review
LucenOne screen analyzing a roof photograph and locating three visual markers
SECOND REVIEWPerson · protection · limitation
LucenOne screen analyzing a worker on a roof, a visible harness and the absence of visible barriers

The source photo remains intact; highlights and proposals are LucenOne layers. The user reviews, confirms, corrects or dismisses proposed elements.

02DocumentDEMO · FICTIONAL DATA

Return to the relevant passage, not an opaque summary.

Facts, corroboration, risks and verification points remain linked to source text.

08_Reponse_prestataire_BatiNord.docxValidated
LUCENONE · FICTIONAL CASE · HEALTH & SAFETY

Response from contractor BâtiNord Maintenance

FromPaul GiraudDateAugust 19, 2026

We interviewed our technician Julien Morel about the August 12 intervention.

He confirms he was informed that a guardrail section had been removed and states that he used his harness.

However, we have no photo or recording documenting the actual connection of the lanyard.

Our procedure requires a local check before intervention.

03Audio & transcriptDEMO · FICTIONAL DATA

Listen, identify voices and return to the key moment.

Speakers, transcript, timestamps and visual cues remain aligned with the audio.

Procurement-case interview · 27:422 voices
Claire MartinLaurent B.
Claire Martin

Can you explain how supplier BC3 was selected?

Laurent B.

The price was attractive and the lead time was short, but I did not take part in the final comparison.

Claire Martin

Who approved the recommendation and on what criteria?

CONFRONT THE CASE

Reconstruct the sequence. Put accounts side by side.

The timeline restores sequence while preserving access to sources. When a factual incompatibility appears, LucenOne presents it as a point to investigate — never an automatic conclusion.

Source-backed eventsContradiction ≠ divergenceExplicit point to resolve
Explore LucenOne Intelligence
Timeline of eventsCentral reference · August 12, 2026
Periodic harness inspectionDocument
Dated intervention observationIntervention record
Scheduling email and internal exchangeEmail
Not all barriers in place around 11 a.m.Interview
HSE inspection reportDocument
Source confrontation1 contradiction · 24 sources

Presence of protective barriers during the intervention

SOURCE ANo barrier present

“No perimeter protective barrier was installed around the area.”

≠
SOURCE BBarriers present

“Perimeter protective barriers were installed and remained in place.”

POINT TO RESOLVEVerify the exact location, time and available physical evidence.
04InterviewDEMO · FICTIONAL DATA

Make the interview navigable evidence.

Question, answer, follow-up point and contradiction remain connected to the interview thread.

Interview · Diane MercierIn progress
Prepare ✓Conduct · 2Use · 3Validate · 4
ACTIVE QUESTIONWhat was Julien’s role during the roof intervention?
Answer obtained…
Q

Did you observe the presence or absence of personal protective equipment?

R

I did not pay attention to that point.

05DeliverableDEMO · FICTIONAL DATA

Move from investigation to a defensible deliverable.

Context, timeline, findings, contradictions and conclusions remain organized in a traceable deliverable.

LUCENONE

Dangerous intervention on the main building roof

Investigation report

CAS-N5G-E23-UH · Version 1.0
1. CONTEXT AND PURPOSESummary of facts and investigation scope

Retained elements remain linked to the sources used.

4. ANALYSIS AND CONFRONTATION
  • Timeline of events
  • Main findings
  • Contradictions and points to resolve
Conclusion prepared from validated elementsHuman validation required before release
Demonstration using fictional data.We show the result produced and how it is used in an investigation, not LucenOne’s internal mechanisms.